Skip to content

Update: Use dispatchSync instead of dispatch for BuildScriptExecutor#6117

Closed
sanjacornelius wants to merge 2 commits intonextfrom
observation/FOUR-13332
Closed

Update: Use dispatchSync instead of dispatch for BuildScriptExecutor#6117
sanjacornelius wants to merge 2 commits intonextfrom
observation/FOUR-13332

Conversation

@sanjacornelius
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sanjacornelius sanjacornelius commented Jan 30, 2024

ci:next
ci:deploy
ci:db:clean
.

Related Tickets & Packages

  • Link to any related FOUR tickets, PRDs, or packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@gitguardian
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gitguardian bot commented Jan 31, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
9412677 Triggered Username Password f9d1468 resources/lang/es.json View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Our GitHub checks need improvements? Share your feedbacks!

@processmaker-sonarqube
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sanjacornelius
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #6132

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant