FOUR-21497 - Fix script retry error handling for script microservice

[nolanpro]

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Script retries were not working with the new microservice

Solution

• Modify the microservice-specific code to support retries

Changed Async to Sync

In the rest-script-runner-2025-winter branch, $sync param is false when running async script tasks. This results in 2 async processes

Run Script -> Async Job -> Run Microservice Script -> Run Async on Microservice

This would complicate the Retry error handling logic and I believe it's unnecessary and could result in additional complexity in the life cycle.

So in this PR I changed it to sync so the original retry logic works the same as it did previously.

How to Test

See jira issue

Related Tickets & Packages

• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-21497

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

[epdl]

@nolanpro here we are forcing this to be sync. This is not the idea, we should control this in the callback response.

[nolanpro]

@epdl in that case, should we remove ProcessMaker/Jobs/RunScriptTask.php and make this entirely synchronous from core's point of view? Do you see any point in using horizon/queues in core for scripts? Queueing one job that queues another job would make the process error prone

[processmaker-sonarqube]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

[nolanpro]

Closing in favor of #7949