Skip to content

add dictionary-based random spatial transforms #166

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
wyli merged 4 commits into from
Mar 11, 2020
Merged

add dictionary-based random spatial transforms #166

wyli merged 4 commits into from
Mar 11, 2020

Conversation

@wyli
Copy link
Contributor

@wyli wyli commented Mar 11, 2020 •
edited
Loading

part of #152 .

Description

  • adds dictionary based random spatial transforms
  • fixes docs
  • fixes an issue of randomized subcomponents

(also locally tested cpu/gpu devices)

Status

Ready

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (fix or new feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New tests added to cover the changes
  • Docstrings/Documentation updated

@wyli wyli requested a review from Nic-Ma March 11, 2020 00:58
Nic-Ma
Nic-Ma approved these changes Mar 11, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Nic-Ma Nic-Ma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most look good to me.

@wyli wyli merged commit 5b1f258 into master Mar 11, 2020
Nic-Ma added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
@Nic-Ma @wyli
WIP-165 update and check APIs for all examples (#168)
a0c36a4 
* add dictionary-based wrapper random spatial transforms (#166)

* [DLMED] change UNet to 1 output

Co-authored-by: Wenqi Li <wenqil@nvidia.com>
@wyli wyli deleted the 152-random-elastic-affine branch April 6, 2020 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Nic-Ma Nic-Ma Nic-Ma approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@madil90 madil90 madil90 left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wyli @madil90 @Nic-Ma