Subprocess input data warning on literal command

[GoldsteinE]

Describe the bug
Bandit reports when user is trying to call subprocess, even when command is static.

To Reproduce
Create test.py:

import subprocess

def f():
    print(subprocess.check_output(['/usr/bin/ls']))

Call:

$ bandit test.py

Expected behavior
Bandit shouldn't report B603 on line 4, because there is no way untrusted input appear there.

Bandit version

bandit 1.5.0
  python version = 3.5.2 (default, Nov 23 2017, 16:37:01) [GCC 5.4.0 20160609]

[tleeuwenburg]

I was taking a look at this. I can't actually think of a safe way to reliably ascertain this at runtime. It is possible to check the argument using bandit, but I can't work out how to distinguish the situation where a string is formatted using a variable one line above and then supplied in. The original source code could maybe be loaded through introspection at runtime and checked but I'm not confident this approach is rock-solid.

Here are a bunch of example signatures and whether I think they are safe or not:
# This is safe because the command is immutable and a new shell is not used
SAFE_STATIC_SHELL = '''
import subprocess

def f():
    print(subprocess.check_output(['/usr/bin/ls']))
'''

# This is unsafe even though the comment is immutable because environment
# variables could be used to modify execution or paths
UNSAFE_STATIC_SHELL = '''
import subprocess

def f():
    print(subprocess.check_output(['/usr/bin/ls'], shell=True))
'''

# This is unsafe because a variable is used to create the command that
# is being run and could therefore be user-modifiable
UNSAFE_STATIC_SHELL2 = '''
import subprocess

def f(command = /usr/bin/ls'):
    print(subprocess.check_output(['%s' % command], shell=False))
'''

# This is unsafe because a variable is used to create the command that
# is being run and could therefore be user-modifiable
UNSAFE_STATIC_SHELL3 = '''
import subprocess

def f(command = /usr/bin/ls'):
    print(subprocess.check_output([command], shell=False))
'''

[Tatsinnit]

+1 and it will be awesome if we can get some official take on this one please (i.e. literal command command in subprocess.checkout throws warning), thanks.

[raratiru]

Bandit reports this even when performing a self test:

bandit -iii -r  bandit

...

>> Issue: [B603:subprocess_without_shell_equals_true] subprocess call - check for execution of untrusted input.
   Severity: Low   Confidence: High
   Location: bandit/cli/baseline.py:107
   More Info: https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/b603_subprocess_without_shell_equals_true.html
106	            try:
107	                output = subprocess.check_output(bandit_command)
108	            except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:

...

[skwashd]

@ericwb can you provide some guidance on how this issue should be resolved? This is blocking our rollout of bandit on a couple of projects. I have a developer who can work on the fix, but it would help if you can point them in the right direction.

[andrew222651]

Duplicate of #333