Closed
Conversation
Member
Author
|
(Similar to the |
Member
|
Thanks! |
This was referenced Feb 28, 2021
This was referenced Apr 8, 2021
This was referenced Sep 16, 2021
Closed
Member
|
How can we make progress with this? Anything that can be split into smaller changes and be contributed by less experienced coders? ;) |
Member
Author
|
I'd like to start looking at this as part of the 0.17 release work, in perhaps a month or so. I'll try to find a good way to split this at that point. |
This was referenced Apr 7, 2022
This was referenced Feb 11, 2023
Member
Author
|
Closing in favour of #3361 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is active branch to replace #1300 and #1304
See the discussions in those PRs to the motivation for the design (and some preliminary benchmarks).
The idea is that we can use this new
experimentalAPI to iterate on types and traits. We should be able to make themacrosandpreludebe compatible with both APIs until we are ready to call the new API stable and then deprecate the original one.TODO (list probably not complete):
experimentalforms of macrostype PyAnyRaw = Py<Any>?