optimize mapping conversion for dict#2954
Merged
Conversation
0482628 to
a2bddfc
Compare
birkenfeld
reviewed
Feb 15, 2023
a2bddfc to
59630be
Compare
Member
Author
|
To reduce the review burden, I'm going to proceed to merge this and #2944. I think both are not controversial. bors r+ |
Contributor
|
Build succeeded: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Equivalent of #2944 for dicts -> mapping.
The benchmark diff is not as significant as in #2944. Still something like 80ns -> 2ns on my machine.