-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Clean up Workflow methods; update naming for Workflow/edit endpoint #49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
953c565
refactor: Change 'new' endpoint to POST with model.options.id
hcat-pge f524304
refactor: Change format of JSON save data
hcat-pge fa1247d
refactor: Only send 'react' to front-end on 'open' endpoint
hcat-pge ed2a076
refactor: Unify Workflow.from_X methods to load JSON
hcat-pge 8f08a05
refactor: Remove unused get/setters. Adds Workflow.path
hcat-pge c230276
feat: Edit Workflow information (name)
hcat-pge 8ffda9b
fix: Workflow.path call, handle middleware exception
hcat-pge 394498b
fix: Make `path` instance method
hcat-pge ab7ea53
refactor: Move 'root_dir' logic to WorkflowUtils
hcat-pge File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here re. static method. In fact, this could probably be an instance method on the
Nodeclass. But maybe not worth it depending how many places call it (and their callers).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The method is only used once, in
store_node_data(), and I thought about removing it completely. Once generated and used for writing data, they can be looked up by accessing thedataattribute on a Node, which I think is all we need (basically your idea of an instance method on theNodeclass?).If there is a reason to keep this, I think it makes more sense in the
Workflowclass since the file name includes the Workflow name.