You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 23, 2025. It is now read-only.
I am getting the following results (where as I am expecting MSE: ~7.75):
test/acc -1.0
test/class_loss 0.0
test/forecast_loss 0.08704246580600739
test/loss 0.08704246580600739
test/mae 1.7290080221756612
test/mape 21375719.51865129
test/mse 9.604532779042728
test/norm_mae 0.1794128092716004
test/norm_mse 0.0870416207133817
test/recon_loss -1.0
test/smape 1.4066449396255207
I am using the following command that is provided by this repo (only difference is the batch_size)
python train.py spacetimeformer solar_energy --context_points 168 --target_points 24 --d_model 100 --d_ff 400 --enc_layers 5 --dec_layers 5 --l2_coeff 1e-3 --dropout_ff .2 --dropout_emb .1 --d_qk 20 --d_v 20 --n_heads 6 --run_name spatiotemporal_al_solar --batch_size 3 --class_loss_imp 0 --initial_downsample_convs 1 --decay_factor .8 --warmup_steps 1000
I am getting the following results (where as I am expecting MSE: ~7.75):
test/acc -1.0
test/class_loss 0.0
test/forecast_loss 0.08704246580600739
test/loss 0.08704246580600739
test/mae 1.7290080221756612
test/mape 21375719.51865129
test/mse 9.604532779042728
test/norm_mae 0.1794128092716004
test/norm_mse 0.0870416207133817
test/recon_loss -1.0
test/smape 1.4066449396255207