Skip to content

Update Project.toml#32

Merged
kshyatt merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ksh/bump
Feb 28, 2026
Merged

Update Project.toml#32
kshyatt merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ksh/bump

Conversation

@kshyatt
Copy link
Member

@kshyatt kshyatt commented Feb 27, 2026

Bump patch version for JLArrays stuff

Bump patch version for JLArrays stuff
@kshyatt kshyatt requested a review from lkdvos February 27, 2026 15:36
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@lkdvos lkdvos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we are now actually spending time updating these packages, it might actually pay off to merge StridedViews and Strided.jl

@kshyatt kshyatt merged commit 389f1f2 into main Feb 28, 2026
11 of 14 checks passed
@kshyatt kshyatt deleted the ksh/bump branch February 28, 2026 06:22
@kshyatt
Copy link
Member Author

kshyatt commented Feb 28, 2026

Since we are now actually spending time updating these packages, it might actually pay off to merge StridedViews and Strided.jl

Agreed, we should discuss which one should absorb the other at some point...

@Jutho
Copy link
Member

Jutho commented Feb 28, 2026

There used to be only Strided.jl, and we have split off StridedViews.jl at some point to be used as a light-weight dependency. However, is there any path of merging these again that is not breaking. If Strided.jl absorbs StridedViews.jl, it will loose a StridedViews entry in its deps and compat section of the Project.toml. So StridedViews.jl can can remain installed. What then happens of people load both packages? Both packages export a StridedView name. However, the Strided.jl implementation only works for Strided.StridedView objects. I assume this rapid development cycle for StridedViews.jl will slow down sometime soon?

@lkdvos
Copy link
Member

lkdvos commented Mar 1, 2026

I have been thinking about this for a bit and I don't think I really see a way to do this in a non-breaking manner. I don't think I mind this breaking change all that much, I think having the two packages separate in the long run is a bit weird (especially now that package extensions exist)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants