Skip to content

Conversation

@lucas-santos-amd
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@rahulbatra85 rahulbatra85 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see comments.
Also, can you rebase and let the CIs run again? May be the layernorm tests run clean this time.

@lucas-santos-amd lucas-santos-amd force-pushed the lusantos/layernorm_bwd_triton branch from c49828e to e05a1e2 Compare June 26, 2025 18:05
@lucas-santos-amd lucas-santos-amd force-pushed the lusantos/layernorm_bwd_triton branch from e05a1e2 to 657d529 Compare July 1, 2025 17:35
@lucas-santos-amd lucas-santos-amd force-pushed the lusantos/layernorm_bwd_triton branch 5 times, most recently from f410299 to 4f5007f Compare July 21, 2025 11:36
@lucas-santos-amd lucas-santos-amd force-pushed the lusantos/layernorm_bwd_triton branch from 4f5007f to d423f85 Compare July 21, 2025 17:03
@rahulbatra85 rahulbatra85 merged commit 3f26818 into main Jul 23, 2025
13 checks passed
@rahulbatra85 rahulbatra85 deleted the lusantos/layernorm_bwd_triton branch July 23, 2025 20:09
cagrikymk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants