Conversation
Member
|
I would postpone this to 1.12 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2977 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.82% 90.84% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 61 61
Lines 11736 11738 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 10659 10663 +4
+ Misses 1077 1075 -2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Member
|
It could be put in now with an option to turn on new behaviour (default off for now). We're getting used to this option shenanigans now, so it's not really much more effort. Then change default to on in 1.12.0 and the 0.5% of folk that break on 1.12.0 can revert until they update. "Do no harm", right? |
Member
Author
|
thanks for following up, haven't found time to sit down for this these few weeks +1 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1596,
Closes #2192
Related #2081
CJ(a, b)being namedV1,V2(there was in our own testing, after all).if (n < 1L) return( null.data.table() )moved earlierHope is that this
name_dotsfunction can be used for fixing this weird autonaming issue as well (but that fix is a bit messier):