Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes two primary changes: an update to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/methods/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-54: Correct removal of unnecessary async modifier!The change to remove the async modifier is appropriate since the function performs only synchronous operations (object construction) and doesn't contain any await statements or Promise returns.
Consider adding TypeScript types for better type safety
While the implementation is correct, consider enhancing type safety by:
- Using explicit TypeScript types instead of inline interface
- Adding validation for the currency type
interface PrepareRequestParams { currency: Currency; payerAddress: string; payeeAddress: string; amount: string; invoiceDetails: IContentData; } interface RequestResult { requestInfo: RequestInfo; paymentNetwork: PaymentNetwork; contentData: ContentData; signer: Signer; } export function prepareRequest(params: PrepareRequestParams): RequestResult { // ... existing implementation }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json(1 hunks)src/methods/index.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/methods/index.ts (1)
1-1: Verify integration with async methods
While the sync to async change is correct, please ensure that integration tests cover the interaction between prepareRequest and async methods like createRequest to verify the change doesn't affect the request creation flow.
PrepareRequestmethod had an async that it should not have, which causes errors when trying to create a request.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
prepareRequestfunction from asynchronous to synchronous, enhancing its execution flow.These changes may affect how users interact with request preparation, ensuring smoother integration with other operations.