Conversation
Contributor
WalkthroughThis pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte (1)
205-205: LGTM with a suggestion for safer null handling.The fix correctly passes the encryption parameters as an array. However, consider adding null checks before the non-null assertions.
Consider this safer approach:
- [payeeEncryptionParams, payerEncryptionParams], + [ + payeeEncryptionParams?.key ? payeeEncryptionParams : undefined, + payerEncryptionParams?.key ? payerEncryptionParams : undefined, + ].filter(Boolean),This ensures we only include valid encryption parameters and prevents potential runtime errors if either value is undefined.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/create-invoice-form/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/create-invoice-form/package.json(1 hunks)packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/create-invoice-form/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/create-invoice-form/package.json
MantisClone
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2024
Merged
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation