Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request implements a sort operator for the query execution engine and standardizes the naming convention for child operator fields across the codebase.
- Implements
SortExecoperator for full sorting andTopKSortExecfor top-k sorting - Renames
childfield toinputin multiple operator structs (ProjectExec, AggrExec, GroupByExec, HavingExec) for consistency with existing operators - Adds comprehensive test coverage for the sort operator including edge cases and different data types
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 14 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/project/projectExec.go | Renames child field to input in ProjectExec for consistency |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/project/parquet.go | Code cleanup: removes comments and aligns field formatting |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/aggr/sort_test.go | Adds comprehensive test suite for sort operators covering initialization, sorting operations, comparison functions, and edge cases |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/aggr/sort.go | Implements SortExec and TopKSortExec operators with support for multi-key sorting and various Arrow data types |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/aggr/singleAggr.go | Renames child field to input in AggrExec for consistency |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/aggr/having.go | Renames batch variable to childBatch and updates related references for clarity |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/operators/aggr/groupBy.go | Renames child field to input in GroupByExec for consistency |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/go.sum | Adds go-jose/go-jose/v4 dependency for testing utilities |
| src/Backend/opti-sql-go/go.mod | Updates Go version to 1.24.0 and adds go-jose dependency |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review for a chance to win a $100 gift card. Take the survey.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 9 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 24 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review for a chance to win a $100 gift card. Take the survey.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.