@dsobek found an issue: an unexpected(?) rename of the connection event on the Ros class. fixing.
Originally posted by @EzraBrooks in #1089
@douglascayers I'm not sure if this was accidental or a deliberate rename for consistency. If deliberate, I think we should probably do it with a deprecation notice for 3.0 - to align with my desire to not break the default constructor functionality for Ros in this version.
Originally posted by @EzraBrooks in #1089
@douglascayers I'm not sure if this was accidental or a deliberate rename for consistency. If deliberate, I think we should probably do it with a deprecation notice for 3.0 - to align with my desire to not break the default constructor functionality for
Rosin this version.