chore: refactor chatInfo/Directory

[MartinSchoeler]

Refactors chatInfo and chatInfoDirectory to ts and makes them use the appropriate components for dataview

REQUIRES #32592

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

• This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label
• This PR is missing the required milestone or project

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: a1d1077

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 55.55556% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.74%. Comparing base (d7de0a9) to head (a1d1077).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #32571      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    56.68%   56.74%   +0.06%     
===========================================
  Files         2504     2502       -2     
  Lines        55524    55528       +4     
  Branches     11442    11484      +42     
===========================================
+ Hits         31472    31509      +37     
+ Misses       21368    21306      -62     
- Partials      2684     2713      +29     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	56.44% <55.55%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unit	72.21% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[dougfabris]

LGTM!

[MarcosSpessatto]

Is it possible to use this PR to fix the issue only? I believe it would be better to keep the conversion to TS in another PR.

canceling, due to tech lead request

[dougfabris]

Closing this one, since it's going to be handled in the Single Contact Identification project