-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
feat: add support for Claude Opus 4.1 (claude-opus-4-1-20250805) #6728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| "@roo-code/types": patch | ||
| "roo-code": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Add support for Claude Opus 4.1 (claude-opus-4-1-20250805) | ||
|
|
||
| - Added claude-opus-4-1-20250805 to anthropicModels with 8192 max tokens and reasoning budget support | ||
| - Added support across all providers: Anthropic, Claude Code, Bedrock, Vertex AI, OpenRouter, and LiteLLM | ||
| - Updated anthropic.ts provider to handle prompt caching for the new model | ||
| - Pricing: $15/M input tokens, $75/M output tokens, $18.75/M cache writes, $1.5/M cache reads | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -175,6 +175,18 @@ export const vertexModels = { | |
| cacheReadsPrice: 0.3, | ||
| supportsReasoningBudget: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| "claude-opus-4-1@20250805": { | ||
| maxTokens: 8192, | ||
| contextWindow: 200_000, | ||
| supportsImages: true, | ||
| supportsComputerUse: true, | ||
| supportsPromptCache: true, | ||
| inputPrice: 15.0, | ||
| outputPrice: 75.0, | ||
| cacheWritesPrice: 18.75, | ||
| cacheReadsPrice: 1.5, | ||
| supportsReasoningBudget: true, | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is this intentional? I noticed that claude-opus-4@20250514 (line 190) doesn't have supportsReasoningBudget: true, but the new claude-opus-4-1@20250805 does. Should we add it to the 4.0 model for consistency, or is there a specific reason for this difference? |
||
| }, | ||
| "claude-opus-4@20250514": { | ||
| maxTokens: 8192, | ||
| contextWindow: 200_000, | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changeset claims support was added across all providers including OpenRouter, but the PR description explicitly states OpenRouter support wasn't added. Could we update this to accurately reflect what was implemented?