Skip to content

Conversation

@gputnam
Copy link
Contributor

@gputnam gputnam commented Nov 4, 2024

Title. Ready for merge.

Depends on external updates:
WireCell/wire-cell-toolkit#341

Also needs a WireCell version with this commit merged in:
WireCell/wire-cell-toolkit@e532442

Also needs the following files added to icarus_data:
icarus_fnal_fit_ks_P0nom_P1bin{0,1,...,14}.json.bz2
icarus_wire_twofaced.json.bz2

Integrates WireCell-based 2D deconvolution in to ICARUS reconstruction, with flavors of both traditional and DNN (Deep-Neural-Net) region of interest (ROI) identification.

See previous presentations: DocDB 37529, 38074, 38939, and 40465.

The 2D signal processing deconvolves across both the time and wire directions, which improves the quality (signal-to-noise and charge resolution) of charge signals, especially on the two induction planes. The filters used in this application are wide compared to other experiments, both in the wire and time dimensions. This broadens the overall charge signal relative to the raw charge.

The implementation builds on the previous half-WireCell implementation which combined elements of the 2D and 1D signal processing change.

In order to integrate the new signal processing with mainline reconstruction, the input labels on the recob::Wires to hit finding are updated.

… jsonnets for various WC SP configs. Move parameters out of json config into fcl config.
@gputnam gputnam marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2024 20:49
…with new H5 interface). Fixes to which frames get created. Don't save H5 files by default.
@gputnam gputnam marked this pull request as draft December 10, 2024 23:02
@SFBayLaser
Copy link
Contributor

As far as I can tell this is still a draft PR.

@SFBayLaser
Copy link
Contributor

If we want to start moving forward with this we should try to get the documentation part of the PR up to speed... As I interpret the presentation at the workshop we should not wait for the DNN ROI just yet?

@SFBayLaser
Copy link
Contributor

As this looks to be essentially ready for integration (sans DNN ROIs), can we please get this properly documented now? This is important before signing off to merge... Likely we have a couple of weeks here so hopefully not an onerous task. Thanks!!

@leoaliaga leoaliaga requested review from SFBayLaser and cerati March 31, 2025 12:16
@gputnam gputnam marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2025 18:43
@leoaliaga leoaliaga removed the request for review from cerati April 22, 2025 23:55
Copy link
Contributor

@SFBayLaser SFBayLaser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks ready to go for me, am giving approval

@leoaliaga
Copy link
Contributor

trigger build

1 similar comment
@leoaliaga
Copy link
Contributor

trigger build

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ CI build for ICARUS Failed at phase build ICARUS on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build ICARUS phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ CI build for ICARUS Failed at phase build ICARUS on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build ICARUS phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

@leoaliaga leoaliaga merged commit 0bc7cd4 into develop May 13, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants