Update PMT calibration db for new PMT detsim

[asanchezcastillo]

Description

This PR modifies the PMT Calibration Database Service to provide the information requires for realistic PTM detsim. In particular, it adds function to retrieve:

• Whether a PMT is on or off, so the signal for off PMTs is not simulated. This is particularly relevant after the implementation of the new trigger emulation tool.
• PMT non-linearity parameters.

It does also modify the database configuration file so it can access the latest database tag.

NOTE: This PR should be updated with commits from #873 once the latter is ready to be merged.

Please provide a detailed description of the changes this pull request introduces.

$${\color{red}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

$${\color{red}\bf{\textrm{IMPORTANT UPDATE June 22nd 2025:}}}$$ If you are making a PR which is intended as a patch for the CURRENT production (which started in Spring 2025), you must make two PRs: one for develop and one for the production/v10_06_00 branch.

$${\color{red}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

Checklist

• Added at least 1 label from available labels.
• Assigned at least 1 reviewer under Reviewers,
• Assigned all contributers including yourself under Assignees
• Linked any relevant issues under Developement
• Does this PR affect CAF data format? If so, please assign a CAF maintainer (PetrilloAtWork or JosiePaton) as additional reviewer.
• Does this affect the standard workflow?
• Is this PR a patch for the ongoing production? If so, separate PR must also be made for production/v10_06_00 branch!

Relevant PR links (optional)

Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?
This PR requires merging SBNSoftware/sbnd_data#4

Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)

Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added?

[nathanielerowe]

@linyan-w is this good to go now?

[linyan-w]

Looks good now to me now! I think #873 needs to go in first otherwise this will be reverted by that.

[nathanielerowe]

trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_12_02 SBNSoftware/sbndaq-artdaq-core@v1_10_06 SBNSoftware/sbn*@SBN_SUITE_v10_12_02

[FNALbuild]

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

[FNALbuild]

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

[FNALbuild]

❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

[FNALbuild]

⚠️ CI build for SBND Warning at phase ci_tests SBND on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the warning phase, check the ci_tests SBND phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

[nathanielerowe]

approved