Update in preparation for Python3.8 deprecation of importing ABCs from collections#3320
Conversation
e9a936d to
b5c4d17
Compare
|
Test failures appear to all be plotting and docs related so I think this is blocked for now |
|
@DPeterK is my understanding correct that this is failing for reasons other than the changes made in the PR? |
|
@znicholls you are right, all recent PRs against |
d0c2515 to
a233d48
Compare
e4af836 to
f695009
Compare
|
@rcomer are you the right person to ask for a review? |
@bjlittle will know the best person to nominate to review this. |
|
@bjlittle are you able to review this one, I think it's pretty trivial? |
|
This looks OK except for the change to |
|
Should be sorted now cheers @ajdawson ! |
|
Thanks @znicholls, would you mind squashing into a single commit? In case you don't know, you can squash these commits by doing an interactive rebase onto the commit before your first one |
8537452 to
76cee31
Compare
|
Assuming I haven't mucked up the header handling I think this should be good now |
Just intrigued @ajdawson - why do you want @znicholls to do that, when you can squash on merge yourself : is it just for the contributor to write the commit message ? |
Habit I suppose... I assume you are referring to the squash-and-merge button? In this case that would have been a sensible use of it. |
😁 |
Updates the use of collections in preparation for Python3.8, see python/cpython@c66f9f8 (and also avoids deprecation warnings when using iris in Python3.7).