SPEC 0: drop py310 and support py313#6195
Merged
trexfeathers merged 20 commits intoSciTools:mainfrom Feb 24, 2025
Merged
Conversation
benchmarks/asv.conf.json
Outdated
Comment on lines
-46
to
-49
| ], | ||
| "44fae030": [ | ||
| "ENV_PARENT={conf_dir}/.asv/env/nox310", | ||
| "PY_VER=3.10 nox --envdir={env_parent} --session=tests --install-only --no-error-on-external-run --verbose" |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In this case I would prefer that we keep the old one too, as we occasionally have need to benchmark further back in history.
benchmarks/asv.conf.json
Outdated
| ], | ||
| "delegated_env_commands": { | ||
| "c8a663a0": [ | ||
| "ENV_PARENT={conf_dir}/.asv/env/nox313", |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is awkward - we don't know what the new commit hash will be once this is merged. I didn't think of that 🙄
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Discussed with @ESadek-MO: if you just provide one of the commit hashes that is on your branch, and then we'll merge this one with a merge-commit (not a squash).
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Almost, however there are now duplicate 3.13, which is what is causing the benchmark failure. The sequence should be 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 - unlike other things we are not describing CI coverage, but support for benchmarking older commits if requested.
github-actions
bot
added
the
benchmark_this
Contributor
Author
|
Looks like python 3.13 is causing a lot of test failures. Most of these seem to be in cml files where I'm seeing |
Contributor
Author
|
Looks like this change might be the cause of the failing tests, python/cpython#107947 . |
5 tasks
Contributor
|
hi folks, we are ready to roll out support for ESMValCore and Python 3.13 in ESMValGroup/ESMValCore#2566 - @bouweandela brought this issue to my attention, do we understand that |
Contributor
The test failures are all caused by a change in XML character representation, which stops us comparing against known-good-outputs. This has made 5% of our tests 'blind' until we can work on a solution. But we have NO evidence of any Iris functionality breaking, and 95% of our tests still work and they show Iris functioning fine. Your own passing tests (ESMValGroup/ESMValCore#2566 (comment)) back this up even more. So the Iris 'project' cannot support Python 3.13 until we can get our CI working with 3.13; we have no immediate plans for finishing this work as we need space to finish some other things. But it looks like the Iris software supports 3.13 just fine already 👍. This happens with all new Python versions - our users have success with it before we even get a chance to test against it. |
Contributor
wonderful, exactly the answer I was looking for, both wrt clarity and content, cheers, Martin! 🍺 |
# Conflicts: # docs/src/whatsnew/latest.rst # requirements/locks/py311-linux-64.lock # requirements/locks/py312-linux-64.lock # requirements/locks/py313-linux-64.lock
stephenworsley
force-pushed
the
python-313
branch
from
cea9fde to
7957983
Compare
stephenworsley
force-pushed
the
python-313
branch
from
7957983 to
217b162
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6195 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.88% 89.87% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 90 90
Lines 23447 23450 +3
Branches 4361 4361
==========================================
Hits 21076 21076
- Misses 1644 1646 +2
- Partials 727 728 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
Current review status
|
Contributor
|
We have a remaining problem with how our expected checks are set up - they are specific to Python versions:
This has previously affected Stratify, but considering the lower traffic that wasn't such a problem there. @HGWright can you offer any extra insight? |
Contributor
Decided as a team to allow repository admins to override the expected checks. |
Contributor
⏱️ Performance Benchmark Report: 601d471Performance shiftsFull benchmark resultsGenerated by GHA run |
ukmo-ccbunney
added a commit
to ukmo-ccbunney/iris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
* upstream/main: (98 commits) [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#6335) SPEC 0: drop py310 and support py313 (SciTools#6195) Better benchmarking Python version handling (SciTools#6329) Move loading and combine code into their own submodules. (SciTools#6321) Bump scitools/workflows from 2025.02.1 to 2025.02.2 (SciTools#6327) replaced reference from build to python build (SciTools#6324) [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#6315) Cache Dask arrays created from `NetCDFDataProxy`s to speed up loading files with multiple variables (SciTools#6252) Bump scitools/workflows from 2025.02.0 to 2025.02.1 (SciTools#6313) [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#6310) Bump scitools/workflows from 2025.01.5 to 2025.02.0 (SciTools#6306) Updated environment lockfiles (SciTools#6301) Improve speed of loading small NetCDF files (SciTools#6229) [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (SciTools#6298) Use cube chunks for weights in aggregations with smart weights (SciTools#6288) Updated environment lockfiles (SciTools#6296) Bump scitools/workflows from 2025.01.4 to 2025.01.5 (SciTools#6300) Bump scitools/workflows from 2025.01.3 to 2025.01.4 (SciTools#6295) Lazy rectilinear interpolator (SciTools#6084) Revert "Fix broken link. (SciTools#6246)" (SciTools#6297) ...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚀 Pull Request
Description
closes #6177