-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
Increase timeout #1148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Increase timeout #1148
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟡 This new entry duplicates the block added by PR #1147 (immediately above at lines 1790-1796) — all four description bullets are verbatim copies. Since PR #1148's diff only modifies perf-changelog.yaml and does not touch
runners/launch_mi355x-amds.sh, the bullet "Bump MI355X SLURM allocation from --time=180 to --time=300" misrepresents what this PR actually does. Consider replacing the four bullets with a singleRetriggering dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglangbullet (matching the convention at line 1727 for PR #1120), and/or backfillingpr-link: #1147on the existing block instead.Extended reasoning...
What the bug is. The new entry appended at lines 1798-1805 reuses, word-for-word, the four description bullets from the entry already in the file at lines 1790-1796. Both blocks have the same
config-keys: [dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglang]and the same description. The only differences are that the new block addspr-link: #1148and the existing block has nopr-linkat all.Why this is misleading. The first bullet — "Bump MI355X SLURM allocation from --time=180 to --time=300 in runners/launch_mi355x-amds.sh" — describes a concrete code change to a runner script. But
git logshows that change was already made by commitd40be91(PR #1147, titled "Bump MI355X SLURM time-limit to 300m; retrigger dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglang"), and the PR metadata for #1148 reportschanged-files count=1with onlyperf-changelog.yamltouched. So as written, the new entry claims credit for a script change this PR does not contain.Step-by-step proof.
git log --onelineincludesd40be91 Bump MI355X SLURM time-limit to 300m; retrigger dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglang (#1147)— confirming PR Bump MI355X SLURM time-limit to 300m; retrigger dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglang #1147 already landed the script bump.perf-changelog.yaml; nothing inrunners/is modified.description:bullets are byte-identical between the two blocks.config-keydescribing the same change — one (from Bump MI355X SLURM time-limit to 300m; retrigger dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglang #1147) without apr-link, and one (from Increase timeout #1148) withpr-link: #1148that falsely attributes the SLURM bump to Increase timeout #1148.Why existing convention doesn't catch this. The file has a precedent for retrigger-only entries: line 1727's PR #1120 entry uses a single bullet "Trigger H100 multinode evals after NVSHEMM fixes" rather than copying the underlying-fix entry's bullets. Following that convention here would have avoided the duplication entirely.
Impact. No runtime impact —
perf-changelog.yamlis documentation. But the changelog is the canonical record of what each PR changed, and a duplicate block plus a mis-attributed bullet clutters that record and will confuse anyone trying to reconstruct when the SLURM time-limit was actually bumped.Suggested fix. Either (a) replace the four-bullet description in this PR with a single
Retriggering dsv4-fp8-mi355x-sglangbullet, mirroring the #1120 convention; or (b) drop the new block entirely from this PR and instead addpr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/1147to the existing #1147 block at lines 1790-1796 (which is currently the onlypr-link-less entry near the bottom of the file).