-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
DSV4 B300 DPA rerun #1162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
DSV4 B300 DPA rerun #1162
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔴 The new changelog entry at lines 1837-1840 is missing the required
pr-linkfield. TheChangelogEntryPydantic model inutils/matrix_logic/validation.pydeclarespr_linkwith no default andextra="forbid", so loading this file will raise aValidationError. Addpr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/1162to match every other entry in the file (including the recent retrigger entries #1148, #1159, and #1160).Extended reasoning...
What the bug is
The new changelog entry added by this PR (perf-changelog.yaml:1837-1840) is:
It has no
pr-linkfield. Every one of the 207 other entries in the file has apr-link(this PR's entry is the only one missing it).Why this breaks validation
utils/matrix_logic/validation.pydeclares the schema for entries in this file:pr_linkhas no default value, so it is a required field. Withextra="forbid"the model also rejects unknown keys, but the failure here is the missing required key: when the changelog loader (load_config_files/process_changelog) constructs aChangelogEntryfrom this dict it will raise a PydanticValidationErrorwith "Field required: pr-link".Why retriggers don't get a pass
The recent retrigger entries demonstrate the convention: PR #1148 (line ~1819), PR #1159 (the previous
dsv4-fp4-b300-sglangretrigger), and PR #1160 (line 1835, immediately above the new entry) all includepr-link. So a "retriggers don't need pr-link" exception does not exist — this is just an oversight.Step-by-step proof
perf-changelog.yamlwith PyYAML — produces a list of dicts; the last dict has keysconfig-keysanddescriptiononly.ChangelogEntry(**entry)(with alias resolution).pr_linkis required (no default), but the dict has nopr-linkkey.ValidationErroris raised, aborting changelog processing for this PR.Fix
Append
pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/1162after thedescriptionblock, matching the format of every adjacent entry.Impact
Severity is "normal" — anything in CI that calls
process_changelogagainst this file (the changelog-driven tooling that decides which configs ran in which PR) will fail until the field is added. The fix is a single line.