-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
update b200 runner #1192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
update b200 runner #1192
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
File renamed without changes.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔴 The b200-multinode runner labels at runners.yaml:74-77 still use the
b200-dgxc-slurm_*prefix, but this PR renamedrunners/launch_b200-dgxc-slurm.sh→launch_b200-dgxc.sh. Since the workflow templates dispatch viabash ./runners/launch_${RUNNER_NAME%%_*}.sh, all sixrunner: b200-multinodejobs in nvidia-master.yaml will fail at the launch step with 'No such file or directory'. Fix by renaming the b200-multinode entries to use theb200-dgxcprefix (and re-registering the self-hosted runners), or by adding alaunch_b200-dgxc-slurm.shsymlink/wrapper.Extended reasoning...
What the bug is
Commit f5ffe76 performs a 100% rename of
runners/launch_b200-dgxc-slurm.sh→runners/launch_b200-dgxc.sh(visible asR100ingit show f5ffe76 --name-status). The single-nodeb200group in.github/configs/runners.yamlis also relabeled fromb200-dgxc_0..9to zero-paddedb200-dgxc_00..09. However theb200-multinodegroup atrunners.yaml:74-77is left untouched and still reads:The code path that triggers it
All three workflow dispatchers compute the launch script from the runner name with bash parameter expansion that strips everything from the first underscore:
.github/workflows/benchmark-multinode-tmpl.yml:177—bash ./runners/launch_${RUNNER_NAME%%_*}.sh.github/workflows/benchmark-tmpl.yml:154— same.github/workflows/profile.yml:167— sameRUNNER_NAMEis set from${{ runner.name }}, i.e. the literal label from runners.yaml.Step-by-step proof
runs-on: b200-multinodejob lands on the runner namedb200-dgxc-slurm_6.RUNNER_NAME=b200-dgxc-slurm_6.${RUNNER_NAME%%_*}strips from the first_to the end, yieldingb200-dgxc-slurm(the hyphens are not delimiters).bash ./runners/launch_b200-dgxc-slurm.sh.ls runners/shows onlylaunch_b200-dgxc.sh;grep launch_b200-dgxc-slurmreturns no hits).No such file or directory, and the workflow step fails.Why existing code does not prevent it
Nothing else in the dispatch chain re-maps the prefix; the workflow uses the raw runner-name prefix to pick the script. The renamed
launch_b200-dgxc.sheven contains theIS_MULTINODE=truebranch, showing the intent was to cover the multinode case — but the runner labels were not updated to match.Impact
.github/configs/nvidia-master.yamldeclaresrunner: b200-multinodein six places (lines 5, 390, 6623, 6759, 6929, 7128), covering DSR1-FP4 / DSR1-FP8 dynamo-trt and dynamo-sglang multinode benchmarks. Every one of these will fail at the launch step immediately after this PR merges. The h100/h200 stacks are unaffected because their multinode labels (h100-dgxc-slurm_*,h200-dgxc-slurm_*) still match their existinglaunch_h100-dgxc-slurm.sh/launch_h200-dgxc-slurm.shscripts — only b200 has the prefix mismatch after this PR.Fix
Two straightforward options:
b200-multinodeentries to share the new prefix, e.g.b200-dgxc_06/07/08(and re-register the self-hosted runners under the new labels) so${RUNNER_NAME%%_*}resolves tob200-dgxcand dispatches tolaunch_b200-dgxc.sh.runners/launch_b200-dgxc-slurm.sh→launch_b200-dgxc.sh) so the existing labels keep resolving.