[AMD] Update MI355x Deepseek-R1 FP4 SGLang Image to v0.5.7

[ppalanga]

Updating the SGLang docker image to the SGLang community docker image
Image=lmsysorg/sglang:v0.5.7-rocm700-mi35x

Impacted configurations: MI355x Deepseek-R1 FP4

Link to the runs: TBD

---

Note

Updates MI355x DeepSeek-R1 FP4 SGLang config to use the upstream v0.5.7 image and records the change.

• Bump image for dsr1-fp4-mi355x-sglang to lmsysorg/sglang:v0.5.7-rocm700-mi35x in .github/configs/amd-master.yaml
• Add entry in perf-changelog.yaml documenting this update

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9dc7f1a. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ppalanga, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the SGLang Docker image to version v0.5.7 for the MI355x Deepseek-R1 FP4 configuration. This change ensures that the specified configuration utilizes the latest SGLang community image, potentially incorporating recent features, performance enhancements, or bug fixes from the SGLang project.

Highlights

• SGLang Image Update: The SGLang Docker image for the dsr1-fp4-mi355x-sglang configuration has been updated from v0.5.6.post2 to v0.5.7.
• Configuration File Change: The .github/configs/amd-master.yaml file was modified to reflect the new SGLang image version.
• Changelog Entry: A new entry has been added to perf-changelog.yaml documenting the update of the MI355x Deepseek-R1 FP4 SGLang Image to upstream v0.5.7.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the SGLang docker image for the dsr1-fp4-mi355x-sglang configuration to version v0.5.7. The change is correctly applied to .github/configs/amd-master.yaml and documented in perf-changelog.yaml. My review identifies a minor issue in the changelog file where a placeholder for the pull request link needs to be updated.

[functionstackx]

@ppalanga any reason why this pr is only mi355 fp4 and not mi300/mi325/mi355 fp8? or should we expect that in follow up PR

[ppalanga]

@ppalanga any reason why this pr is only mi355 fp4 and not mi300/mi325/mi355 fp8? or should we expect that in follow up PR

Yes, the FP8 will be available in a different PR. Thanks!

[cquil11]

lgtm once sweep passes