Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This change refactors the existing tests to use the _Good, _Bad, and _Ugly testing convention. This provides a more structured approach to testing and ensures that a wider range of scenarios are covered, including valid inputs, invalid inputs, and edge cases. In addition to refactoring the tests, this change also includes several bug fixes that were uncovered by the new tests. These fixes improve the robustness and reliability of the codebase.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3577865431736069141 started by @Snider

Refactored the existing tests to use the `_Good`, `_Bad`, and `_Ugly`
testing convention. This provides a more structured approach to testing
and ensures that a wider range of scenarios are covered, including
valid inputs, invalid inputs, and edge cases.

In addition to refactoring the tests, this change also includes several
bug fixes that were uncovered by the new tests. These fixes improve the
robustness and reliability of the codebase.

The following packages and commands were affected:
- `pkg/datanode`
- `pkg/compress`
- `pkg/github`
- `pkg/matrix`
- `pkg/pwa`
- `pkg/vcs`
- `pkg/website`
- `cmd/all`
- `cmd/collect`
- `cmd/collect_github_repo`
- `cmd/collect_website`
- `cmd/compile`
- `cmd/root`
- `cmd/run`
- `cmd/serve`
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.14907% with 109 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/all.go 52.00% 33 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
cmd/serve.go 32.35% 22 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/collect_website.go 60.41% 13 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
pkg/pwa/pwa.go 70.58% 14 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/compile.go 78.94% 4 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
cmd/run.go 79.48% 4 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@Snider Snider marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2025 10:44
@Snider Snider merged commit 952a287 into main Nov 14, 2025
4 checks passed
@Snider Snider deleted the refactor-add-good-bad-ugly-tests branch November 14, 2025 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant