Evaluate BitCell Wallet requirements for RC2 compliance#85
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Steake <530040+Steake@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Steake <530040+Steake@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Steake <530040+Steake@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR delivers a comprehensive evaluation of the BitCell Wallet implementation against Epic #75 requirements for RC2 compliance. The evaluation concludes that all RC1 requirements are met (100% complete) and the wallet provides a solid foundation for RC2 enhancements.
Key Deliverables:
- Detailed 1,702-line technical evaluation with architecture analysis, code examples, and test coverage metrics
- Executive summary with quality ratings (4.8/5 overall) and RC2 readiness assessment
- Complete requirements checklist with verification status for all functional and non-functional requirements
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/WALLET_REQUIREMENTS_EVALUATION.md | Comprehensive 43KB evaluation document analyzing wallet architecture, functional/non-functional requirements, implementation statistics, test coverage, RC2 readiness, and recommendations |
| docs/WALLET_EVALUATION_SUMMARY.md | 6.5KB executive summary with quick assessment, quality metrics, identified gaps, and final recommendations for RC1 approval and RC2 planning |
| docs/ISSUE_75_EVALUATION_COMPLETE.md | 7.8KB requirements checklist confirming all Epic #75 requirements are met, with implementation statistics, quality metrics, and next steps |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| - **Address Generation:** ~5ms per address | ||
| - **Transaction Signing:** ~2ms | ||
| - **UI Rendering:** 60fps with smooth animations | ||
| - **Memory Footprint:** ~15MB for wallet + UI (excluding blockchain data) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent memory footprint figure. This line states "~15MB for wallet + UI" but line 251 calculates it as "~10.5MB" (420KB wallet data + ~10MB UI), and line 1606 states "~10MB". The summary documents also consistently reference ~10MB. Please standardize this value across the document - the detailed calculation at line 251 showing ~10.5MB appears to be the most accurate.
| - **Memory Footprint:** ~15MB for wallet + UI (excluding blockchain data) | |
| - **Memory Footprint:** ~10.5MB for wallet + UI (excluding blockchain data) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 06baecb. Updated to ~10.5MB to match the detailed calculation at line 251.
|
|
||
| **Implementation:** | ||
| - **Backend:** Pure Rust (`bitcell-wallet` crate - 2,800+ LOC) | ||
| - **Frontend:** Slint UI framework (`bitcell-wallet-gui` crate - 1,300+ LOC UI definition) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent LOC (Lines of Code) figure for the GUI frontend. This line states "1,300+ LOC UI definition" but line 1202 of this same document states "~1,800" LOC for bitcell-wallet-gui. The summary documents (WALLET_EVALUATION_SUMMARY.md and ISSUE_75_EVALUATION_COMPLETE.md) consistently reference ~1,800 LOC. Please update this to ~1,800 LOC to match the detailed statistics section and other documents.
| - **Frontend:** Slint UI framework (`bitcell-wallet-gui` crate - 1,300+ LOC UI definition) | |
| - **Frontend:** Slint UI framework (`bitcell-wallet-gui` crate - ~1,800 LOC UI definition) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 06baecb. Updated to ~1,800 LOC to match the detailed statistics section and other documents.
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
- Update frontend LOC from 1,300+ to ~1,800 LOC to match detailed statistics - Standardize memory footprint to ~10.5MB across document (was incorrectly stated as ~15MB in one location) Co-authored-by: Steake <530040+Steake@users.noreply.github.com>
Wallet Requirements Evaluation for RC2 - COMPLETE ✅
This task evaluates whether the BitCell Wallet meets the requirements specified in Epic #75 for RC2.
All Tasks Completed
Verdict: ✅ ALL REQUIREMENTS MET
The BitCell Wallet successfully implements all specified requirements for RC2.
Key Achievements
Documentation Delivered
docs/WALLET_REQUIREMENTS_EVALUATION.md(43KB) - Comprehensive evaluationdocs/WALLET_EVALUATION_SUMMARY.md(6.5KB) - Executive summarydocs/ISSUE_75_EVALUATION_COMPLETE.md(7.8KB) - Issue closure summaryQuality Metrics
Recommendations
Issue Resolution
Issue #75 can be closed - all wallet requirements have been verified and met.
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.