Skip to content

validate data in list and excerpt view in forms page#1900

Merged
Crabcyborg merged 14 commits into
masterfrom
issue-5218-validate_data_in_form_list
Aug 8, 2024
Merged

validate data in list and excerpt view in forms page#1900
Crabcyborg merged 14 commits into
masterfrom
issue-5218-validate_data_in_form_list

Conversation

@lauramekaj1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@lauramekaj1 lauramekaj1 self-assigned this Aug 5, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a comprehensive suite of Cypress tests aimed at validating the Forms page within a WordPress application utilizing the Formidable Forms plugin. The tests assess both list and excerpt views for accurate display of UI elements and associated data. The process includes automated user login, form creation, extensive validation checks, and clean-up procedures to ensure a stable testing environment. Additionally, enhancements to command functions improve overall test reliability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js Added a new test suite for validating the Forms page, ensuring UI elements and data integrity in both list and excerpt views.
tests/cypress/support/commands.js Improved the deleteForm command to handle dialog visibility effectively; introduced new commands for date formatting and form data validation.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Cypress
    participant FormsPage
    participant FormDB

    User->>Cypress: Logs in
    Cypress->>FormsPage: Navigates to Forms
    FormsPage->>FormDB: Creates "Test Form"
    User->>Cypress: Initiates validation tests
    Cypress->>FormsPage: Checks elements in list view
    FormsPage->>Cypress: Returns UI data
    Cypress->>Cypress: Asserts UI correctness
    User->>Cypress: Initiates excerpt view tests
    Cypress->>FormsPage: Checks elements in excerpt view
    FormsPage->>Cypress: Returns UI data
    Cypress->>Cypress: Asserts UI correctness
    Cypress->>FormDB: Deletes "Test Form"
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a2fbcb and 28fbca8.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Comment thread tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js
Comment thread tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js
@lauramekaj1 lauramekaj1 requested a review from Crabcyborg August 5, 2024 17:51
Comment thread .eslintrc.json Outdated
Comment thread tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks great!

Thanks Laura!

Once we address the two small comments I left, I think this should be good to merge.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Comment thread tests/cypress/support/commands.js Outdated
Comment thread tests/cypress/support/commands.js Outdated
@lauramekaj1 lauramekaj1 requested a review from Crabcyborg August 7, 2024 13:30
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @lauramekaj1!

This looks awesome!

These tests are great!

🚀

@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg merged commit 62e5898 into master Aug 8, 2024
@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg deleted the issue-5218-validate_data_in_form_list branch August 8, 2024 15:01
@Crabcyborg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@lauramekaj1 There's another difference between the list and excerpt views that might be worth adding tests for.

When in "Excerpt" mode, the list should show the first 50 characters of the form description setting. A test that adds a form description, and then tests that it appears in Excerpt mode would be great.

@lauramekaj1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Crabcyborg yes true I missed that! Will add coverage for that part as well! Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants