Fix payments lists empty when inbox count is displayed#2221
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Crabcyborg has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Formidable Payments plugin's controllers, focusing on managing the visibility of payment-related hooks and screen options based on unread inbox items. The primary modifications are in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Admin as Admin Interface
participant HooksController as FrmTransLiteHooksController
participant EntriesHelper as FrmEntriesHelper
participant PaymentsController as FrmPaymentsController
Admin->>HooksController: Trigger admin_init
HooksController->>EntriesHelper: Get visible unread inbox count
EntriesHelper-->>HooksController: Return unread count
alt Unread items exist
HooksController->>PaymentsController: Conditionally apply payment columns hook
HooksController->>HooksController: Adjust screen options visibility
end
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
stripe/controllers/FrmTransLiteHooksController.php (2)
68-74: Update @SInCE version number.The
@sincetag contains a placeholder "x.x". Please update it with the actual version number for this release.
82-83: Consider extracting hook name construction to a shared method.The hook name construction logic is duplicated between this controller and
FrmTransLiteListsController. Consider extracting it to a shared helper method to maintain DRY principles and ensure consistency.stripe/controllers/FrmTransLiteListsController.php (1)
96-101: Consider reusing the menu name construction logic.This is the third occurrence of unread count handling logic. Consider extracting the menu name construction (including unread count) to a shared helper method to avoid duplication and ensure consistent behavior.
Example helper method:
public static function get_menu_name_with_count() { $menu_name = sanitize_title( FrmAppHelper::get_menu_name() ); $unread_count = FrmEntriesHelper::get_visible_unread_inbox_count(); return $unread_count ? $menu_name . '-' . $unread_count : $menu_name; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
stripe/controllers/FrmTransLiteHooksController.php(2 hunks)stripe/controllers/FrmTransLiteListsController.php(2 hunks)stubs.php(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cypress
🔇 Additional comments (5)
stubs.php (2)
324-329: LGTM! Method signature is well-defined.The method signature is properly documented and aligns with the PR objective of managing payment lists.
411-418: Verify the need for duplicate payment_columns methods.Both
FrmTransListsControllerandFrmPaymentsControllerhave similarpayment_columnsmethods. While this might be intentional for separation of concerns, please verify:
- The distinct responsibilities of each method
- Whether this split is necessary or if the functionality could be consolidated
Let's check the usage of these methods:
stripe/controllers/FrmTransLiteHooksController.php (2)
37-42: LGTM! Good choice of hook timing.The
admin_inithook is appropriate here as it ensures the fix runs after admin menus are registered but before the interface is displayed.
75-96: Verify hook name compatibility with WordPress standards.The constructed hook name includes a dash and number (
-{$unread_count}). Let's verify this doesn't cause issues with WordPress hook naming conventions.✅ Verification successful
Hook name construction follows WordPress standards
The hook name is properly constructed and sanitized. The use of dashes and numbers in hook names is acceptable in WordPress, and this pattern is consistently used across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for similar hook patterns in WordPress core and popular plugins # to verify if using dashes and numbers in hook names is a common practice. # Search in WordPress core hooks rg -i "add_filter\(\s*['\"]manage_.+\d+.+columns" # Search in current codebase for similar patterns rg -i "add_filter\(\s*['\"]manage_.+[\-\d].*columns"Length of output: 485
stripe/controllers/FrmTransLiteListsController.php (1)
16-17: LGTM! Clean implementation of unread count handling.The conditional append of unread count to the hook name is well implemented using a ternary operator, making the code both concise and readable.
No description provided.