Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 63: Inefficient regular expression#62
Draft
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 63: Inefficient regular expression#62
Conversation
…ression Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Repository owner
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Feb 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/Tanker187/vite/security/code-scanning/63
In general, to fix inefficient regular expressions we need to remove or reduce the ambiguity inside quantified subpatterns so that the engine has a deterministic path and doesn’t need to explore exponentially many alternatives. Common techniques are: (1) making alternatives mutually exclusive (e.g., via more specific character classes), (2) replacing nested greedy quantifiers with a single, clearer one, and (3) restructuring the overall pattern to avoid “Kleene star over ambiguous alternation”.
Here, CodeQL flags
[^\n]*in the branch//[^\n]*[$\n]ofentirelyImportRE. The overall pattern is:Semantics: the whole string must be composed only of:
importstatements with string literals (side-effect imports),/* ... */, or// ...that end with either$or a newline.The problematic
//branch is:Within the big outer
(?: ... )*, this branch is followed by other branches and repetition, and the[^\n]*part is greedy and can consume many$and/characters that also participate in the outer structure; when the match ultimately fails at the end, the engine must backtrack in many ways. We can avoid this by tightening the line-comment branch so that it consumes characters only up to the first$or newline, since the pattern anyway requires the comment to end with$or newline. That is, instead of “any non-newline characters, then$or newline”, we can use “any non-newline and non-$characters, then a$, then the rest until newline/EOF”. This removes the ambiguity regarding where a$inside the comment is consumed.A precise, behavior-preserving rewrite is:
Explanation:
\/\/– line comment start.[^\n$]*– any number of characters that are not newline and not$, ensuring the first$we encounter is special.\$– the required$marking the end of the “special” part.(?:[^\n]*\n|[^\n]*$)– the rest of the line until newline or (if this is the last line) end of string.This still enforces that a
//comment must contain at least one$before the end-of-line or end-of-string, like the original//[^\n]*[$\n], but makes the quantifiers unambiguous: there is exactly one$used as the “terminator” for the requirement, and[^\n$]*cannot also consume it.We can now update
entirelyImportREto use this safer line-comment branch, leaving the other branches and anchors unchanged. No new imports or helper functions are required; we only change the regex literal inentirelyImportRE.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.