Just reading through the header for basic_claim and can see there is no as_object() to match the as_string(), as_array() and other similar functions
Not good with the standard by any means - but from the spec
For JWTs, while claim names are strings, claim values can be any JSON type
Of which an object should be fine. Is there a reason for as_object to be omitted or is this an oversight?
I can make a pull if its an oversight
Just reading through the header for
basic_claimand can see there is noas_object()to match theas_string(),as_array()and other similar functionsNot good with the standard by any means - but from the spec
Of which an
objectshould be fine. Is there a reason foras_objectto be omitted or is this an oversight?I can make a pull if its an oversight