Example signal computation with custom emissivity#207
Example signal computation with custom emissivity#207lasofivec merged 11 commits intoToFuProject:develfrom
Conversation
|
Hello @flothesof! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
Comment last updated at 2019-11-06 11:04:19 UTC |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #207 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 43.93% 43.86% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 70 70
Lines 21288 21294 +6
==========================================
- Hits 9352 9340 -12
- Misses 11936 11954 +18
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
I've fiddled a bit more with the plots and realized that I have questions about the following items:
|
Probably we should do both suggested solutions. For sure a section on "tofu's conventions" is missing in the doc.
As stated in the doc, the function Lines 2882 to 2888 in 93ae5c5 However the tutorial is still failing, this time when plotting the signal. I opened an issue regarding this, see Issue #217 |
… (1, npix) data and np.squeeze on t=[0], de-activated np.squeeze
|
Problem solved, see Issue #217 |
…custom_emissivity.py gives very different results depending on whether newcalc=True or False. False definitely seems to be the proper solution
|
This example is for the online documentation, so the figures will be non interactive. |
|
Plotting issue solved, |
|
I'm going to merge this pull request since all bugs have been corrected in branch |
As discussed with @Didou09 this is a "new" example (inspired by one of the benchmarks).