refactor: using strict equality operator check#64
Merged
typeslint-cli[bot] merged 2 commits intoTypeslint:developmentfrom Apr 23, 2024
Merged
refactor: using strict equality operator check#64typeslint-cli[bot] merged 2 commits intoTypeslint:developmentfrom
typeslint-cli[bot] merged 2 commits intoTypeslint:developmentfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Hello @Muunatic Thank you for submitting Pull Request, please wait for next notification after we review your Pull Request |
typeslint-cli
Bot
added
Pending
Ichigoez
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2024
![typeslint-cli[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/160439?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
typeslint-cli
Bot
added
Approved
Member
Author
|
ready to merge |
Contributor
|
Merged by Muunatic! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
using strict equality for consistent type checking
note: bypassing review as it's not crucial (appoved by 2nd acc)