Skip to content

Consistent naming conventions for signedness, addendum#332

Merged
rossberg merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
consistent-signedness-addendum
Sep 5, 2015
Merged

Consistent naming conventions for signedness, addendum#332
rossberg merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
consistent-signedness-addendum

Conversation

@rossberg
Copy link
Member

@rossberg rossberg commented Sep 5, 2015

This would fit nicely with the convention and is more informative.

This naming would fit nicely with the convention and is more informative.
@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

lgtm.

I can see arguments both ways here; thinking of arithmetic right shift as a signed integer operation entails thinking of it as performing a division operation that rounds differently from div_s for negative values, but it works.

@titzer
Copy link

titzer commented Sep 5, 2015

lgtm

rossberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2015
Consistent naming conventions for signedness, addendum
@rossberg rossberg merged commit d902182 into master Sep 5, 2015
@rossberg rossberg deleted the consistent-signedness-addendum branch September 5, 2015 19:20
@jfbastien
Copy link
Member

I updated LLVM accordingly:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL247028

earl pushed a commit to earl/llvm-mirror that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants