Merged
Conversation
Member
|
lgtm, but I'd leave open so other can chime in. |
Member
Author
|
Merging based on lgtm and no other objections. |
lukewagner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2015
Add call_import to call section
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch tweaks the call section to match #54 in the spec repo. As explained, instead of attempting to inject imports into the function table (shared with normal function definitions), imports are given their own table called via
call_import(instead ofcall_direct). From what I can tell, this simplifies basically everything (spec, impl, code generator).