Skip to content

[spec] Clarify in conventions that atoms can be symbolic #1602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
rossberg merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

[spec] Clarify in conventions that atoms can be symbolic #1602

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion document/core/syntax/conventions.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Grammar Notation

The following conventions are adopted in defining grammar rules for abstract syntax.

* Terminal symbols (atoms) are written in sans-serif font: :math:`\K{i32}, \K{end}`.
* Terminal symbols (atoms) are written in sans-serif font or in symbolic form: :math:`\K{i32}, \K{end}, {\to}, [, ]`.

* Nonterminal symbols are written in italic font: :math:`\X{valtype}, \X{instr}`.

Expand Down