Skip to content

Move to Phase 2 #19

@alexcrichton

Description

@alexcrichton

I've proposed on 2024-10-08 that if the CG agrees that there's a vote to move this proposal to phase 2. The phase 2 entry requirements are:

  • Precise and complete overview document is available in a forked repo around which a reasonably high level of consensus exists.
  • Updates to the actual spec document, test suite, and reference interpreter are NOT yet required.

The main purpose of the meeting will be to achieve the point of "reasonably high level of consensus". My plan would be to start landing support for this proposal in tools like LLVM, wasm-tools, and Wasmtime once it reaches phase 2.

Perhaps the main question I'm seeking to address is the overflow-flags-vs-128-bit-add question. That seemed like one of the bigger questions at the last meeting and is something I plan on dedicating time to discussing what's been investigated and the results in the meantime. In other words I plan to mostly summarize #18 and have discussion around it.

I'm opening this issue ahead of time in case anyone would like to discuss anything ahead of time or such before the meeting.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions