https://events.ccc.de/congress/2018/wiki/index.php/Session:Open_science
Co-writing a proceedings of our meetup
Find the initial brainstorming at https://board.net/p/35C3_OpenScience
- use the #OpenScience liberally
- follow @OpenScienceMOOC
- commit to co-writing a proceedings paper
After several #35C3 sessions on #OpenScience and related topics we want to get together to get to know each other and discuss further.
- … (keyote Claudia Frick)
- … (predatory journals, Julia Jerke)
- FOSS Asia
- critical making in Academia (Regina Sipos & Saad Chinoy)
Why is Open Science not already happening as the default?
In less than 60 minutes, 21 ppl discussed a range of topics relating and rotating around #OpenScience, #OpenAccess and #OpenScienceHardware. The outcomes will be captured, further elaborated upon and published #openaccess.
Related CCCongress Survey: https://twitter.com/Lambo/status/1079006777264492544
Saturday Dec 29, 2019 at 7:30pm (60 min) Venue: WikiPaka Kitchen
- Jo Havemann, https://twitter.com/johave, https://github.com/johav
- Lambert Heller, @Lambo, https://tib.eu/Lambo
- Claudia Frick @FuzzyLeapfrog
- Julia Jerke @juliajerke
- Anja Lorenz, @anjalorenz (TH Lübeck/oncampus)
- Natanael Arndt, @white_gecko, http://aksw.org/NatanaelArndt, https://natanael.arndt.xyz/
- Leander Seige https://twitter.com/mjkls
- Tracy Hoffmann, @nabatz
- Frederik Stey, @inkOne (HLB Fulda)
- Saad Chinoy @saadcaffeine
- Kai @Kai_Obi
- Benjamin Braatz @HeptaSean
- Oliver Keller @0zelot (CERN/Hackuarium/GOSH: http://openhardware.science)
- Anna Klingauf @aiko_psi (Uni Kassel)
- Anastasia Gilz @TalkToNa
- Mario Behling https://twitter.com/mariobehling, https://twitter.com/pslabapp, www.pslab.io
- Katha @katharakt
(suggestions, feel free to add alternatives)
- add not more than 3 arguments per person pro and/or against each of the following + reference if applicable
- collaboratively write on Github.com
- publish at Zenodo.org // #35C3 proceedings
Multiple payed process (scientists, editors, journal fees) Journal Packages without any need for the most of them - higher costs for science
'In my lab I'm the only one interested in open access."
Concerned individuals isolated in the lab
missing interlinks of state of the art in different communities, how to find the findings in other areas
Communities don't have to overlap - new informations / resources are not shared by default, especially when they're not open
- quality measures: impact factor / h-factor etc.
- funding mechanis
What to do about senior researchers who are in charge? Stop the "passing on" of (bad) traditions: People targeting at high ranked journals trying to get a bigger impact - and ruining it all
- Science needs to be better explained to the public --> more public science communication
ComicBook Format is super effective for storytelling, need more science centric good content like "Super Science Friends" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Science_Friends or like PhD Comics
The Adventures of Shewy the Electric Microbe: https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.teachersource.com/downloads/lesson_pdf/Shewy_the_Electric_Microbe.pdf
(congress perspective)
- organize meetups locally
- Reputation by editorship (run your own academic journal)
Join Open Science Barcamp 2019, in Berlin March 18 - https://www.open-science-conference.eu/barcamp/
Organize an Open Science BarCamp at your institute
Join / kickoff local Open Science meetups! Look for People from library and other sectors to help you with this!
we should probably abandon the hashtag #fakescience in the context of predatory journals because it gives the impression that those journals however are some form of science
Are preprint repositories a sustainable approach for #OpenAccess? How can junior researchers be motivated to publish open access? Peer pressure, Prof pressure, etc.
Publishing as HTML on the Web and respond to the Call for Linked Research > indexible by search engines, discuss about the paper in the paper, annotate the paper
Examples: http://csarven.ca/enabling-accessible-knowledge and http://csarven.ca/this-paper-is-a-demo
Funding requests for OA publications by library not each individual scientist (administrative work)
What is holding back "platinum OA"? Wrong incentives for junior researchers, the conventional system (paywall, publish or perish etc.) does not value open science and communication between scientists
Crowdfund the buyout of Copyright - e.g. www.unglue.it (for books) and www.unpaywall.org (for research articles)
Publish Papers open access
https://waag.org/en/open-wetlab-faq
Open Source Medicine
use free and open-source hard- and software to bypass copyright issues
https://rolandturner.com/yahi/
Microbial Fuel Cells: electricity from mud-microbes
DIY Fermentation: gut microbes to instil cultural interaction
educational hardware
- SlideWiki (http://slidewiki.org/, http://slidewiki.eu)
- How colonial is the global research landscape (still) today?
Amano T, González-Varo JP, Sutherland WJ (2016) Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science. PLoS Biol 14(12): e2000933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933
Preprint repository for African research output: AfricArXiv http://africarxiv.org/
ImpactFactor (using them as quality indicator for one publication and the journal, adding them up, ...) H-Index
Counting number of publications and citations
Funding based on publications
Missing method for quality evaluation (only quantitative)
Publishing infrastructure in commercial hands / not in the hands of science
Universities are organized federated in themselves, faculties and research groups are in some kind autonomous, so we need some system that can be installed/setup at any level to federate the research findings and aggregate them on any level (university, faculty, institute, researchgroup/lab, researcher)
Monopolies like Google Scholar, WoS - decentralized alternatives
Pressure to publish, lack of awareness re differences between fields
Who owns critical research infrastructure, e.g. systems of reseacher evaluation?
Commercial entities (publishers) dictating research flows Missing reliable/standardized research information systems
We have to use central services to get our scores and publications lists
Job offering for professorships shouldn't aks for journal indicators, but instead for open practices / experiences
How to do science and get funding without beeing attached to established research institutions
Where does the money come from?
Pay for permissions to re-use material
Transparency of public spending could be a lever
Scientists not getting paid for some of their work (peer review, admin, …)
using Patreon as a "pay as you like" subscription model to incentivise the adoption and use of CreativeCommons licensed publication
Evaluation based solely / mainly on traditional publications; there are other products / activities
Journal indicators, h-index, Impact factor, etc.
Being lost in legal issues, as a researcher / librarian
Copyright issues
Data security
Data privacy
Libraries cannot take the risk of publicly archiving free available content - there are no fair use licenses in Germany!