Skip to content

Envoy's TLS certificate matcher for `match_typed_subject_alt_names` may incorrectly treat certificates containing an embedded null byte

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Dec 3, 2025 in envoyproxy/envoy • Updated Dec 5, 2025

Package

gomod github.com/envoyproxy/envoy (Go)

Affected versions

>= 1.36.0, <= 1.36.2
>= 1.35.0, <= 1.35.6
>= 1.34.0, <= 1.34.10
<= 1.33.12

Patched versions

1.36.3
1.35.7
1.34.11
1.33.13

Description

Summary

Envoy’s mTLS certificate matcher for match_typed_subject_alt_names may incorrectly treat certificates containing an embedded null byte (\0) inside an OTHERNAME SAN value as valid matches.

Details

This occurs when the SAN is encoded as a BMPSTRING or UNIVERSALSTRING, and its UTF-8 conversion result is truncated at the first null byte during string assignment. As a result, "victim\0evil" may match an exact: "victim" rule and be accepted by Envoy.

PoC

Create a CA and a server certificate signed by that CA.
Create two client certificates signed by the same CA:
client_evil with OTHERNAME BMPSTRING = "evil"
client_null with OTHERNAME BMPSTRING = "victim\0evil"
Configure Envoy with require_client_certificate: true and a match_typed_subject_alt_names entry for the OTHERNAME OID with matcher.exact: "victim".
Connect without a client cert → connection rejected.
Connect with client_evil → connection rejected.
Connect with client_null → connection accepted (but shouldn't!).

Impact

An attacker who can obtain a trusted client certificate with a null byte embedded in an OTHERNAME SAN can exploit this vulnerability. The practical impact is unauthorized impersonation of the matched identity, enabling access to services or APIs protected by that exact OTHERNAME check.

Credit

markevich.nikita1@gmail.com

References

@phlax phlax published to envoyproxy/envoy Dec 3, 2025
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Dec 3, 2025
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Dec 5, 2025
Reviewed Dec 5, 2025
Last updated Dec 5, 2025

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(15th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Null Termination

The product does not terminate or incorrectly terminates a string or array with a null character or equivalent terminator. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2025-66220

GHSA ID

GHSA-rwjg-c3h2-f57p

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.