docs(blog): Why Your Agent Can't Audit Itself#443
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a new blog post explaining the architectural reasoning behind moving from in-process receipt signing to a separate daemon (ADR-0010), registers it in the site sidebar, and adds a v0.10.0 entry to the daemon changelog describing the redaction pipeline, the new agent-receipts list CLI, the mcp-proxy thin-emitter change, and the SDK bump.
Changes:
- New blog post
daemon-process-separation.mdxcovering the in-process vs. daemon split, peer credential capture, and the unified chain. - Sidebar entry for the new post in
site/astro.config.mjs. daemon/CHANGELOG.mdv0.10.0 entry summarising redaction,agent-receipts list, mcp-proxy emitter conversion (with flag-removal breaking changes), and thesdk/gov0.9.1 bump.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| site/src/content/docs/blog/daemon-process-separation.mdx | New blog post on daemon process separation and the audit property it restores. |
| site/astro.config.mjs | Adds sidebar link for the new blog post. |
| daemon/CHANGELOG.md | Documents v0.10.0 changes: redaction pipeline, agent-receipts list, mcp-proxy thin-emitter conversion, sdk/go bump. |
Retitle to declarative form, drop the apologetic intro paragraph, fold "deliberately small" into the original-design framing, and flatten a handful of writing tropes (rule-of-three buildup, "no X / no Y / no Z", "falls out naturally", "what actually provides the property").
Replace clinical phrasings with warmer word choices throughout, and lean into the elegance of the underlying mechanics — particularly in the peer credential section, where the kernel-attested identity is now framed as the daemon asking the kernel directly. Adds the image of an auditor "holding its own signing key" to make the v1 limitation concrete, and notes that the separation is "structural, not policy".
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft blog post on daemon process separation — intended to publish before PR #442 (unified chain + redaction demo).
Covers:
Ends with a forward reference to the next post (unified chain + redaction demo).