Skip to content

docs: reconcile audit-project counts with agentsys methodology#12

Merged
avifenesh merged 2 commits intomainfrom
docs/reconcile-audit-project-counts
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

docs: reconcile audit-project counts with agentsys methodology#12
avifenesh merged 2 commits intomainfrom
docs/reconcile-audit-project-counts

Conversation

@avifenesh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@avifenesh avifenesh commented Apr 15, 2026

Summary

  • plugins.json: clarify audit-project's 10 agents are role-based specialists (same 10 that agentsys counts in its 49 total). Set `agents_type: role-based`, fix commands 1 -> 3, skills 1 -> 0
  • skills.json: remove phantom `audit-review` entry (no SKILL.md exists at `audit-project/skills/`)

Why

Follow-up to the workspace repo-intel scan: agentsys updated its agents definition to 49 = 39 file-based + 10 role-based, but agent-sh.dev plugins.json attributed those same 10 as audit-project-owned static agents with mismatched vocabulary. This aligns the data files with the agentsys definition.

Also surfaces that agentsys itself lists 'audit-project' as a skill in its Code Review category even though the plugin has no skills directory. Filing a follow-up agentsys PR to fix the 40->39 skill count.

Test plan

  • `npm run build` succeeds (all 4 pages built)
  • plugins.json parses; skills count matches skills.json after removal

Note

Low Risk
Low risk metadata-only changes to plugin/skill catalogs; no runtime logic changes beyond what the site displays/counts.

Overview
Clarifies audit-project catalog metadata to match the agentsys counting methodology by marking its 10 agents as role-based (agents_type: "role-based"), updating the description, and adjusting the declared commands/skills` counts.

Removes the stale audit-review entry from skills.json so published skill counts align with the actual available skills.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8935274. Configure here.

audit-project has no file-based agents or SKILL.md on disk; its 10
agents are dynamically-spawned role-based specialists (code-quality,
security, performance, architecture, database, API, frontend, backend,
DevOps, test-quality). These are the same 10 that agentsys counts under
its "role-based" bucket contributing to the 49 total.

- plugins.json: add agents_type: role-based, clarify in description,
  fix commands 1 -> 3 (actual audit-project*.md count), skills 1 -> 0
- skills.json: remove phantom 'audit-review' skill entry (no SKILL.md
  exists at audit-project/skills/)

This also surfaces an agentsys-side drift where the README lists
'audit-project' as a skill under Code Review - its 40-skill total
should be 39. Tracking that in a separate agentsys PR.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the metadata for the audit-project plugin, including its description, agent type, and skill/command counts, while removing the associated audit-review skill from the skills registry. Feedback suggests shortening the plugin description to avoid potential UI layout issues and removing internal reconciliation notes. Additionally, the reviewer noted that hardcoded skill and plugin totals in src/pages/skills.astro must be updated to maintain data consistency following these changes.

Comment thread src/data/plugins.json Outdated
Comment thread src/data/skills.json
- plugins.json: trim audit-project description (drop cross-doc
  reconciliation note per gemini comment - belongs in CHANGELOG not
  a user-facing plugin summary)
- skills.astro: update title/subtitle from stale 28 skills / 13 plugins
  to current 33 / 14 (reflects removal of phantom audit-review skill
  plus what's actually listed in skills.json)
@avifenesh avifenesh merged commit f3d70d9 into main Apr 15, 2026
3 checks passed
@avifenesh avifenesh deleted the docs/reconcile-audit-project-counts branch April 15, 2026 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant