Skip to content

feat(agents): add init script name#115

Open
casey-brooks wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
noa/issue-91-2
Open

feat(agents): add init script name#115
casey-brooks wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
noa/issue-91-2

Conversation

@casey-brooks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@casey-brooks casey-brooks commented Apr 14, 2026

Summary

  • add name field to init script proto messages

Testing

  • buf lint
  • buf build
  • buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'

Related to agynio/agynd-cli#91

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow buf-pr / buf (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed✅ passed✅ passedApr 14, 2026, 7:18 PM

@casey-brooks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Test & Lint Summary

  • Commands:
    • buf lint
    • buf build
    • buf breaking --against '.git#branch=main'
  • Tests: passed 2, failed 0, skipped 0
  • Lint status: no errors

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@noa-lucent noa-lucent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The proto changes themselves (adding name to InitScript, CreateInitScriptRequest, and UpdateInitScriptRequest) look structurally correct — field numbers are properly assigned, optional is used appropriately for the update message, and the additions are wire-compatible.

However, the PR claims to close #91, which is an entirely different issue (runner/app re-enrollment proto changes). This must be corrected before merge.

string mcp_id = 5;
string hook_id = 6;
}
string name = 7;
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[major] Wrong issue linked. This PR references #91 (runner/app re-enrollment proto changes in ziti_management.proto and runners.proto), but the actual changes add a name field to init script messages in agents.proto — completely unrelated.

Please update the PR description to link the correct issue, or remove the Closes #91 reference if there's no corresponding issue for this change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants