Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow named "GitHub Actions Linting" has been introduced. It runs on pull requests to the main branch, specifically when changes are made to workflow or action files. The workflow checks out the code and uses the Changes
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
stalniy
force-pushed
the
chore/actionlint
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e1db8a4 to
e8bf562
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/github-actions-lint.yml (2)
10-13: Enforce least-privilege permissions
By default,GITHUB_TOKENhas broad scopes. Since this job only needs to read workflow files, restrict it with apermissionsblock, for example:jobs: lint: + permissions: + contents: read + actions: none runs-on: ubuntu-latest
14-15: Verify pinned action versions
You’ve pinnedactions/checkout@v4andraven-actions/actionlint@v2by major version. For greater stability, consider pinning to a specific patch release (e.g.,actions/checkout@v4.10.0) or a commit SHA.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/github-actions-lint.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/github-actions-lint.yml (2)
1-2: Workflow name is descriptive
GitHub Actions Lintingclearly conveys its purpose and intent.
16-21: actionlint configuration looks solid
Lockingversion: 1.7.7and supplying targeted ignore flags matches the project’s needs. Just ensure the regex patterns behave as expected—testing them locally can help confirm no unintended warnings slip through.
stalniy
force-pushed
the
chore/actionlint
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1d560fa to
816c3f7
Compare
2 participants
Why
To ensure that our github actions are healthy at CI time, not after we merge and find out something doesn't work
What
Adds actionlint GHA action to lint github actions/workflows
Summary by CodeRabbit