refactor: reduces usage of services variable#1772
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
WalkthroughThis change refactors how services are accessed within the onboarding email verification flow. Direct imports of service modules are removed and replaced with the use of a centralized Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Component as EmailVerificationContainer
participant Services as useServices()
participant Auth as auth
participant Analytics as analyticsService
Component->>Services: Call useServices()
Services-->>Component: Return { auth, analyticsService }
Component->>Auth: sendVerificationEmail(user.id)
Component->>Analytics: track('event')
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
stalniy
force-pushed
the
refactor/cleanup-services
branch
from
587bd1d to
5f0c33a
Compare
baktun14
approved these changes
Aug 6, 2025
Contributor
baktun14
left a comment
baktun14
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My bad this is my code, thanks for fixing.
stalniy
force-pushed
the
refactor/cleanup-services
branch
from
5f0c33a to
e1a49fb
Compare
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1772 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 42.47% 42.18% -0.30%
==========================================
Files 933 928 -5
Lines 26291 26113 -178
Branches 6969 6954 -15
==========================================
- Hits 11168 11015 -153
+ Misses 13954 13930 -24
+ Partials 1169 1168 -1
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
stalniy
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
We need to inject services via
useServicesnot by directly importing itSummary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests