For #206. Adding prune method to Volumes

[bkuzmic]

For #206:

• added prune method to Volumes
• added unit tests for RtVolumes

[0crat]

Job #210 is now in scope, role is REV

[0crat]

This pull request #210 is assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @amihaiemil/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 361

• 7 of 7 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 85.237%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 357:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	485
Relevant Lines:	569

---

💛 - Coveralls

[paulodamaso]

@bkuzmic Just some cosmetic import changes, please take a look

[amihaiemil]

@bkuzmic @paulodamaso looks good, thanks! :) for the future, I don't think imports have to be in alphabetic order, we can skip this kind of cosmetic stuff.

[amihaiemil]

@rultor merge it

[rultor]

@rultor merge it

@amihaiemil OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge it

@amihaiemil Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 2min)

[0crat]

Quality is low, no payment, see §31:

[0crat]

The job #210 is now out of scope

[0crat]

Job gh:amihaiemil/docker-java-api#210 doesn't exist in WBS, can't create order

[0crat]

Payment to ARC for a closed pull request, as in §28: +10 point(s) just awarded to @amihaiemil/z

[paulodamaso]

@amihaiemil I did not received reputation payment for this one Why 0crat decided this one had bad quality?

[amihaiemil]

@paulodamaso Because you didn't leave any comment on it. I should have waited for your review, but I hurried, sorry :D

[paulodamaso]

@amihaiemil no problem