Adding basic gmm example for verification#1
Merged
andrewcsmith merged 1 commit intoandrewcsmith:Issue-#152-use-cholesky-factorizationfrom Oct 19, 2016
Merged
Conversation
9b18f1a
into
andrewcsmith:Issue-#152-use-cholesky-factorization
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a new example for GMM using simulated data.
Running on the current changes the results don't look crazy but they are also not correct. If you run this example on the current master branch you will get good estimates for the means, covariances, and weights. On the active branch the values are noticeably off.
Before we merge this example into master we'll (I'll) need to do a little more work. I'll add a section to the README and maybe add some optional plotting using dataplotlib. Also the print output should show the true values and then the inferred ones for easy comparison. This is a little tricky as the order of the inferred values will be random.