Please review pull requests before approving them, as they damage things that are already working correctly. You're behaving like little children, approving things just because they have a good title.

[titet11]

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

• I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

They fix one thing and break another.

Are we supposed to be dealing with a serious program or one designed for clowns?

Or are they just amateur programmers who don't even know what they're doing?

I'm fed up with them fixing one thing and, due to their lack of professionalism, ruining another.

For example:

Now the session history isn't working, and some incompetent person added the "files modified" status right after the conversation ended, which is annoying and disruptive.

(Please be a little more professional when approving requests; stop approving them just for the sake of approving them.)

[github-actions]

This issue doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines.

What needs to be fixed:

• The "Describe the enhancement you want to request" field does not contain an actual feature request. It consists entirely of complaints about code quality and developer decisions, with no actionable enhancement described. Please describe a specific feature or improvement you would like to see added to the project.

Please edit this issue to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.

If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.

[github-actions]

Thanks for updating the issue! The feature request now meets our contributing guidelines. We appreciate you taking the time to fill out the template properly.

[Alexandero89]

Although I don't really agree with the wording, I can only support the idea behind it.

It's important to remember that this is an open source project where people work for free. No one is forcing you to use this project, and you are free to use another app if you don't like this one.

But the quality of the updates and pull requests really leaves a lot to be desired.
I think there is an urgent need for a proper CI/CD pipeline with proper testing.

It looks as if people have a local problem that they then have solved by AI, which works brilliantly for their specific environment but breaks the app for everyone else.

I no longer install updates because every update has fixed one bug and introduced three new ones (as I write this, my PC's fan is running at full speed because OpenCode inexplicably needs immense amounts of CPU power to send a request to Claude and then display the response).

If a maintainer contacts me, I am happy to have a quick chat to help set up a CI/CD pipeline and write some tests + expand the contribution guide so that new PRs not only have to pass the tests but also have to provide new tests if necessary.

And despite all the criticism, I would like to thank the developers. Because despite the bugs, it is a good piece of software that makes my everyday work easier!

[MaffooBristol]

I don't agree with the tone of the issue's wording, as mentioned this is an open source project. But the rate at which things are changing, especially massive UI overhauls, is kinda annoying. Every time I update the app it just looks different, and buttons have moved around, and it's never actually for the better. There needs to be some semblance of stability, especially with such frequent updates.

[raymelon]

I thought my important sessions are gone too lol