You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note: This is a tracking issue to make the Edit tool more reliable. It covers the immediate fixes we're working on and a plan for the long-term solution.
The Edit tool frequently rejects valid operations with the error File [...] has been modified since it was last read in two common scenarios:
Undo/Redo: When reverting a chat to a previous state using /undo or the UI.
Session Persistence: When reopening a session after a restart or reloading the window.
In both cases, the model often has the correct context (either restored from history or "remembered" from the session), but the internal safety check fails, forcing redundant Read calls and wasting valid Edit calls (which can be expansive and take a long time for big edits).
Root Cause
The current FileTime implementation relies on in-memory timestamps (Date) compared against the filesystem's mtime.
Undo/Redo: Reverting files via git snapshots updates their mtime on disk, making them appear "newer" than the last time the model read them, even if the content is exactly what the model expects.
Persistence: The FileTime state is stored in memory (Instance.state). When the server restarts, this state is lost, so any subsequent edit attempts fail until the file is read again.
Proposed Solutions
1. Immediate Fixes
Two separate PRs address the immediate pain points:
This PR manually updates the FileTime entry for affected files whenever a revert or unrevert operation occurs.
Pros: Solves the immediate friction for undo/redo.
Cons: It blindly trusts that the model has read the file in the context we are reverting to. If we revert to a point before the file was read, this allows an edit without a read. However, this is a much rarer scenario (since most models reliably use the read tool if they haven't seen the file before). Even though it IS a risk, it's still way better than the current state.
Context Awareness: When performing an undo, the system would restore the hash map to its state at that point in history.
Verification: The Edit tool would check if the current on-disk hash matches the "expected" hash from the session state. If they match, the edit proceeds regardless of the timestamp.
Discussion
I'm down to implement the hashing solution, but I wanted to sanity check the direction first.
Related PRs & Issues
The Problem
The
Edittool frequently rejects valid operations with the errorFile [...] has been modified since it was last readin two common scenarios:/undoor the UI.In both cases, the model often has the correct context (either restored from history or "remembered" from the session), but the internal safety check fails, forcing redundant
Readcalls and wasting validEditcalls (which can be expansive and take a long time for big edits).Root Cause
The current
FileTimeimplementation relies on in-memory timestamps (Date) compared against the filesystem'smtime.mtimeon disk, making them appear "newer" than the last time the model read them, even if the content is exactly what the model expects.FileTimestate is stored in memory (Instance.state). When the server restarts, this state is lost, so any subsequent edit attempts fail until the file is read again.Proposed Solutions
1. Immediate Fixes
Two separate PRs address the immediate pain points:
A. Fix for Undo/Redo (PR #4923)
This PR manually updates the
FileTimeentry for affected files whenever arevertorunrevertoperation occurs.B. Fix for Session Persistence (PR #5045)
This PR persists the
FileTimestate to disk using theStoragemodule.["filetime", sessionID, encodedPath]so the "last read" time survives server restarts.2. Long-term Solution (Persisted Content Hashing)
A more robust architecture would replace or augment the timestamp check with context-aware content hashing.
filePath -> contentHashlinked to the session history.Storagemodule (similar to PR feat: writing filetime reads to disk to persist across process being killed #5045) so it survives restarts.undo, the system would restore the hash map to its state at that point in history.Edittool would check if the current on-disk hash matches the "expected" hash from the session state. If they match, the edit proceeds regardless of the timestamp.Discussion
I'm down to implement the hashing solution, but I wanted to sanity check the direction first.
["filehash", sessionID, encodedPath].FileTimeas the primary check and add hashing as a fallback? This aligns with the suggestion in [FEATURE]: Compare files by Hash as fallback before marking them as 'Must be Read Again' on Edits if Timestamp Doesn't Match #3681.OpenCode version
No response
Steps to reproduce
No response
Screenshot and/or share link
No response
Operating System
No response
Terminal
No response