Skip to content

Conversation

@ashb
Copy link
Member

@ashb ashb commented Jan 7, 2021

This label can be set manually, and the expectation is that it would run
all tests, but in some cases for PRs that don't touch code, it would
still skip most of the matrix and run minimal static checks only.

This changes the behaviour so that if the label is found it will run all
tests no matter what files have been changed -- making the label name
more true :)


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

This label can be set manually, and the expectation is that it would run
all tests, but in some cases for PRs that don't touch code, it would
still skip most of the matrix and run minimal static checks only.

This changes the behaviour so that if the label is found it will run all
tests no matter what files have been changed -- making the label name
more true :)
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. Indeed that was not forced but we can add it.

@ashb ashb merged commit ef2123c into apache:master Jan 7, 2021
@ashb ashb deleted the full-tests-needed-label-ignore-file-changes branch January 7, 2021 13:53
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2021
This label can be set manually, and the expectation is that it would run
all tests, but in some cases for PRs that don't touch code, it would
still skip most of the matrix and run minimal static checks only.

This changes the behaviour so that if the label is found it will run all
tests no matter what files have been changed -- making the label name
more true :)

(cherry picked from commit ef2123c)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants