.airflowignore docs #20311
Merged
.airflowignore docs #20311
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kaxil
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2021
Member
|
NIIICE. Thanks @MatrixManAtYrService ! |
jedcunningham
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2022
This was deleted in an [earlier refactor](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15444/files) (see `concepts.rst`). This PR brings it back. I added it under the "DAGs" section because even though it's file-based and not dag-based, excluding files that define dags is the most likely use case for this feature (I think). (cherry picked from commit 6eac2e0)
potiuk
added
the
changelog:skip
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was deleted in an earlier refactor (see
concepts.rst). This PR brings it back. I added it under the "DAGs" section because even though it's file-based and not dag-based, excluding files that define dags is the most likely use case for this feature (I think).